Brodigan - October 11, 2021 at 01:23PM
Eric Clapton had an adverse reaction when he got his Fauci Ouchie, and he's been critical about it ever since. The legendary guitarist has even refused to play venues that discriminated over their v*xx status. Clapton is a celebrity who is speaking out against the narrative, so of course, he needs to be destroyed by the media. They've also tried to destroy NBA players like Jonathan Issac and Andrew Wiggins. Now, it's Clapton's turn, and Rolling Stone has tagged itself in for this one. The leftist rag has their fangs out over his skepticism and, what they call his "shocking history of racist statements." Because if it was just Eric Clapton being hesitant, no one would bother reading.
The article is behind a paywall. I'm not wasting my money and don't suggest you to either. These RS tweets cover what one can assume are the "highlights" of the article and probably summarize things well.
Eric Clapton loaned an organization his van. The "history" of "racism" are comments he made in 1976 that don't measure up to 2021 sensitivities. And Michael Knowles likes him. I'll give RS the Knowles thing. Though calling Knowles out will only encourage him more. The van, the donation, and comments he made forty-five years ago ... really? One single entertainer is speaking out against the left's new favorite narrative, even though he GOT THE SHOT, and the media thinks he needs to be taken down for it.
If Eric Clapton cared what this dirt sheet threw about him, he might be upset. But this is the same magazine that trashed "Layla," one of the greatest rock songs of all time. Whether it's music or politics, Rolling Stone is only good for lining the litter box.
Get your content free from Big Tech's filter. Bookmark this website and sign up for our newsletter!
from Steven Crowder Says
